Methods for developing inventions with the help of which three programmers can easily create a program using which a computer can invent many inventions by itself

[this is the title of the work, below written is a summary of this work

(this summary consists of 1276 words)]

The first method for developing inventions

consists

in drawing conclusions from

conditional propositions

In logic, there are conditional propositions, for example:

«If: fire is placed under the stone, then: the stone will heat up» (let’s call this conditional proposition the first conditional proposition).

The words of the conditional proposition that stand from (that is, after) the word «if» to the word «then» are called the basis of the conditional proposition (that is, the cause of the conditional proposition), and the words of the conditional proposition that come after the word «then» are called the consequence of the conditional proposition. The double union «if ... then ...» connects the basis and the consequence. That is, the basis of this conditional proposition will be the words «fire is placed under the stone», and the consequence of this conditional proposition are the words «the stone will heat up». Let's take another conditional proposition

«If: the stone will heat up, then: the stone will expand» (let's call this conditional proposition the second conditional proposition).

The consequence of the first conditional proposition consists of the words: «the stone will heat up» and the basis (that is, the cause) of the second conditional proposition consists of the same words: «the stone will heat up». If a person draws a conclusion from the first and second conditional propositions, then as a result of this conclusion he will receive (that is, combine) the following conditional proposition:

«If: fire is placed under a stone, then: the stone will expand» (let's call this conditional proposition the third conditional proposition).

Many similar examples can be cited.

First rule: in order for a computer to draw a conclusion from two conditional propositions, it (that is, a computer) must do the following: find in its memory two such conditional propositions, in which the consequence of the first conditional proposition and the basis (that is, the cause) of the second conditional proposition have the same meanings or consist of the same words, which located, in the same sequence. Then the computer must instead of the basis of the second conditional proposition, put the basis of the first conditional proposition. And thus the computer transforms the second conditional proposition into the third conditional proposition (that is, in this way the computer from two conditional propositions will receive a third conditional proposition, this third conditional proposition may be new information or not new information).

Have the same meanings: a) the word and the interpretation of this word b) synonyms and so on. That is, it is known that has the same meanings (that is, it is known which combinations of words have the same meanings).

If, for example, the first and second conditional propositions (which are described above) are stored in the computer’s memory, and if other conditional propositions are recorded in the computer’s memory, then the computer can, without human help of a person, find from the conditional propositions (which are stored in the memory of this computer) two such conditional propositions, at which the consequence of the first conditional proposition and the basis (that is, the cause) of the second conditional proposition (have the same meanings or) consist of the same words in the same sequence. This confirms the following: it is known that has the same meanings (that is, it is known which combinations of words have the same meanings), it is known that the computer can find the same words that are in the same sequence and are located in different parts of its memory. Then the computer can, without human help of a person, instead of the base of the second conditional proposition, put the base of the first conditional proposition (this must be done according to the above rule). And thus the computer converts the second conditional proposition into the third conditional proposition (a huge number of similar examples can be given), that is, the computer can sometimes from two information obtain (that is, combine) the third information. Based on this and on the analysis of the literature, we can conclude that the computer, by means of the first rule, can itself draw conclusions from conditional propositions that are recorded in its memory (that is, in the memory of this computer) and as a result of this obtain (that is, combine) conditional propositions (each of these conditional propositions will be information). Some of these conditional propositions will be new information (that is, some of these conditional propositions will be such conditional propositions, each of which will be new information). Moreover, some of these conditional propositions will be such conditional propositions, each of which will be new information that has significant novelty (that is, each of which will be new information that for a specialist will not explicitly follow from the prior art). And new information, according to some encyclopedias, some dictionaries of the Russian language and some foreign patent laws, is an invention.

Based on the analysis of the literature, I came to the conclusion that the description of almost any invention can be stated so that it (that is, this description) will be a conditional proposition. By the way, physical effects (that is, physical phenomena) chemical effects and other effects (they can be stated in the form of conditional propositions) are most often used to create inventions. As a result of the analysis of the literature, I came to the conclusion that almost all currently known information that is needed to create inventions can be stated in the form of conditional propositions. It is necessary to record information in the computer's memory, usually in the form of conditional propositions, so that the computer can draw conclusions from these conditional propositions. This method of invention (that is, the first method of invention) consists in the invention (that is, the creation) of inventions by the computer by means of following: the computer makes inferences from conditional propositions by means of the first rule.

If the computer draws a conclusion from the first and second conditional propositions (using the first rule), then it will receive the third conditional proposition. And if the computer makes a conclusion (using the first rule) from the third conditional proposition and some conditional proposition, then it will receive a conditional proposition (let's call this conditional proposition the fourth conditional proposition). And if the computer makes a conclusion (using the first rule) from the fourth conditional proposition and some conditional proposition, then it will receive a conditional proposition, and so on. That is, a computer can thus obtain causal chains, that is, trees (that is, graphs).

Based on the analysis of the literature, I came to the conclusion that a computer by means of this method of invention (that is, the first method of invention) will create an invention if it (that is, this computer) receives a new conditional proposition (that is, receives new information) as a result of receiving conditional propositions whose base will be a description of the arrangement of substances (or will be a description of the continuously changing arrangement of substances), which people will be able to make up (without the help of devices or with the help of known devices) at the time when the computer receives this new conditional proposition (that is, the basis of this new conditional proposition will be a description of what people will be able to do at the time the computer receives this new conditional proposition).